PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 5.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME Z270-A (all builds) |
Memory | 4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170322 |
Uptime | 5.5 Days |
Run Date | Oct 21 '18 at 15:33 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
|
66.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2201 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
5.15%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 196 194 187 186 187 MB/s
|
97.5%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 198 197 199 196 199 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3333 C16 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
56.4%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 3,699x |
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples | 1,438x |
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 613x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 1,147x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 864x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 810x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 98% - Outstanding | Total price: $654 |