QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 02 '18 at 16:49
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5620
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 61.7
1-Core 50
2-Core 104
44% 71.9 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 320
31% 257 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.7% Poor
Lighting 33.7
Reflection 0.12
Parallax 32.1
28% 22 fps
MRender 34.5
Gravity 36.1
Splatting 33.3
28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 483GB
229GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 51 51 70 84 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 76%
Qemu HARDDISK 258GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 6.1 13 12 27 9.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 100
Write 177
Mixed 182
SusWrite 14.4
90% 118 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 6.6
1,085% 5.57 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 98%
Qemu HARDDISK 1TB
136GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 6.5 12 12 28 9.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 59
Write 35.2
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 14.7
31% 41.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.4% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 14.8
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback