Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '22 at 12:36
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300U
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Memory 15.5
1-Core 45.1
2-Core 65.5
23% 42 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 147
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
MSI(1462 3030) 2GB
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.7% Poor
Lighting 32.3
Reflection 30
Parallax 47.5
26% 36.6 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 25.9
Splatting 24.2
22% 26.5 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 43GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 335
Write 188
Mixed 375
229% 299 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 4.4
1,015% 6.77 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 89%
Red Hat VirtIO 21GB
7GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 397
Write 183
Mixed 327
229% 302 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
47% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.9% Poor
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 12.1
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 3.6
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 356
11% 356 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback