Asus H110M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive13.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H110M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '18 at 14:04
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 207
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 414
55% 412 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Lighting 46.2
Reflection 31.6
Parallax 38.9
38% 38.9 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 42.6
Splatting 37.4
32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 48GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 14 13 12 14 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
13.7% Very poor
Read 83.8
Write 68
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 12.9
13% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 9
29% 8.97 MB/s
DQ Read 9
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 9.1
7% 9.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 26%
Ccboot iSCSI 1TB
43GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 19 19 16 16 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14% Very poor
Read 85.8
Write 38.3
Mixed 60
SusWrite 16.5
11% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 9.3
29% 9 MB/s
DQ Read 9.4
DQ Write 8
DQ Mixed 7.1
6% 8.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14%
Great: 103%
Ccboot iSCSI 500GB
43GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 19 19 16 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.5% Very poor
Read 87.8
Write 47.2
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 16.5
11% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 9.4
31% 9.37 MB/s
DQ Read 7.8
DQ Write 9.8
DQ Mixed 6
5% 7.87 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 88%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 16GB
9GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 5 3.8 4.6 4.7 4.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 37
Write 6
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 4.5
14% 14 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.5
112% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 11.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 10.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-PLUS Builds (Compare 627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $338
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback