Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	304% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Z370 Killer SLI/ac (all builds)
Memory	23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180704
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '18 at 23:10
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$192 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	Memory 87.8 1-Core 135 2-Core 274 91% 166 Pts	4-Core 531 8-Core 839 84% 685 Pts	64-Core 1,030 64% 1,030 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B1) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Lighting 69.3 Reflection 70.5 Parallax 60.5 56% 66.8 fps	MRender 69.8 Gravity 67.7 Splatting 68 56% 68.5 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 777GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1682 1662 1473 1127 1107 1097 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	304% Outstanding	Read 2,378 Write 2,076 Mixed 1,557 SusWrite 1,358 413% 1,842 MB/s	4K Read 59.7 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 79.2 266% 93.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,051 DQ Write 872 DQ Mixed 946 712% 956 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 304% Great: 372%
Crucial M500 480GB-$84 9,168 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 299GB free Firmware: MU05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 362 381 383 374 367 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Read 394 Write 360 Mixed 319 SusWrite 372 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 95.9 4K Mixed 35.3 134% 52.1 MB/s	DQ Read 332 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 182 175% 274 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 155GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 106 105 101 105 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 112 Write 102 Mixed 73.7 SusWrite 105 72% 97.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.7% Good	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 21 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 26.3 SC Mixed 21.8 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 109%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 99%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	47x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	42x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	35x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	67x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	48x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	42x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $848

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16