Asrock FM2A58M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A58M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150508
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 22 '18 at 19:34
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 59.2
2-Core 103
48% 77.2 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 130
16% 123 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 2GB
CLim: 920 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.10.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Lighting 27.5
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 32.5
22% 29.7 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 34.4
23% 27.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 8.8 82 48 0.9 10 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.9% Below average
Read 177
Write 101
Mixed 133
SusWrite 45.6
25% 114 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 16.6
78% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 111
95% 140 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 85%
Samsung HD320KJ 320GB
118GB free
Firmware: CP100-11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 61 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 61
Write 66.5
Mixed 40
SusWrite 61.8
42% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 45%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 8GB
7GB free, PID 070e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 18
Write 17.5
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 17.5
24% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 4.2
308% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF CT51264BD160BJ.M8F 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.5% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 8.7
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A58M-HD+ Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A58M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $172
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback