Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 214 User benchmarks, average bench 55% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	64% Good	Memory 81 1-Core 55.5 2-Core 119 53% 85.1 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 479 44% 367 Pts	64-Core 1,233 76% 1,233 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.1 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.65% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 4.31 Parallax 4.12 4% 4.24 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 3.83 Splatting 6.04 4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.65% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 973GB 425 User benchmarks, average bench 157% 819GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 253 20 30 190 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 517 Write 408 Mixed 263 SusWrite 161 75% 337 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 1.8 53% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 28.8 DQ Mixed 17.2 31% 64.5 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 308%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965426-024.A00LF 9965426-003.A01LF 9965426-003.A01LF 9965426-024.A00LF 8GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.2% Average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 14.9 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 5.6 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 78.8 51% 78.8 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples	66x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v21stBench 73%, 400 samples	48x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	47x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	79x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	38x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	26x

RAM
HMT451R7AFR8C-RD 4x4GBHynixBench 82%, 1,002 samples	36x
9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 82%, 908 samples	28x
18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 4x8GBMicronBench 77%, 512 samples	28x

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16