Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision WorkStation 690

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation 690  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0DT029
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080425
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateNov 30 '18 at 01:33
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 5160
Microprocessor, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 34.4
2-Core 68.7
37% 55.4 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 134
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 3700
Nvidia(10DE 055F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.0
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
5.37% Terrible
Lighting 7.23
Reflection 7.15
Parallax 2.38
6% 5.59 fps
MRender 6.24
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 4.65
4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.37%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 172 147 163 167 140 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.5% Good
Read 257
Write 240
Mixed 228
SusWrite 165
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 35.7
116% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 194
146% 195 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 124%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
22GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.3 8.4 8.6 8.1 8.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.59% Terrible
Read 32.8
Write 25.5
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 7.6
21% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
22% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 7.59%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x2GB
8 of 16 slots used
16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 7.7
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation 690 Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision WorkStation 690

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback