Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	88GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 88GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2618-C1
Memory	82.8 GB free of 88 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440x900x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111219
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '18 at 13:12
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Memory 92.8 1-Core 93.8 2-Core 187 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 589 58% 476 Pts	64-Core 1,351 84% 1,351 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Lighting 74.4 Reflection 73.2 Parallax 63.6 61% 70.4 fps	MRender 70.5 Gravity 68.9 Splatting 70.8 58% 70.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: B1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 115 115 113 17 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.9% Poor	Read 113 Write 80.5 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 97 20% 89.9 MB/s	4K Read 8.7 4K Write 14.6 4K Mixed 8.5 32% 10.6 MB/s	DQ Read 16.3 DQ Write 15.2 DQ Mixed 13.5 11% 15 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 85%
Samsung 840 120GB 1,438 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 111GB free Firmware: BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 123 123 123 123 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.7% Below average	Read 129 Write 123 Mixed 124 SusWrite 123 28% 125 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 31.2 4K Mixed 22.4 73% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 89.7 DQ Mixed 79.5 64% 90 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 102%
Seagate ST3000DM008-2DM166 2TB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 199 200 201 203 201 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 204 Write 158 Mixed 80.8 SusWrite 200 117% 161 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 108%
WD WD5000AVCS-6 500GB 9,720 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 465GB free Firmware: 0A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 87 87 87 85 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	49.9% Average	Read 87.8 Write 84.7 Mixed 50.9 SusWrite 86.2 57% 77.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 51%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 897GB free Firmware: 1118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 86 86 85 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 94.1 Write 86.2 Mixed 61.5 SusWrite 86.4 60% 82 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 11x8GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 11 of 12 slots used 88GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	54% Above average	MC Read 23.6 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 20 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6.3 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 62.4 64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS R670-2 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	14x
Xeon E5540IntelBench 63%, 486 samples	9x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56801stBench 71%, 2,389 samples	5x

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	9x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	9x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	6x

SSD
Mercury Elec 240GBOWCBench 36%, 15 samples	8x
Logical Volume 478GBLsilogicBench 45%, 9 samples	7x
JAJS600M256C 256GBBench 69%, 1,795 samples	4x

RAM
6x8GBUnknownBench 53%, 2,890 samples	11x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	8x
12x8GBUnknownBench 53%, 575 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16