Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory18.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateDec 10 '18 at 21:34
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 186
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 332
46% 343 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Lighting 73
Reflection 74.2
Parallax 100
60% 82.5 fps
MRender 74.5
Gravity 70.3
Splatting 59.6
55% 68.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 349 237 251 257 256 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 441
Mixed 363
SusWrite 283
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 40.2
131% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 111
154% 284 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 134%
Maxtor 6H500F0 500GB
442GB free
Firmware: HA431DD0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 63 63 64 64 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 69.6
Write 59.2
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 63.8
43% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.1
147% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 37%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
146GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 106 116 117 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 122
Write 108
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 115
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
672GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 105 118 119 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 59.7
Write 60
Mixed 42.9
SusWrite 116
51% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-198.A00LF 9905403-198.A00LF 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.5% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $989
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback