Dell Studio XPS 7100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics8.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Studio XPS 7100  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0FF3FN
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100910
Uptime9.1 Days
Run DateDec 11 '18 at 21:09
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 630
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 51.6
1-Core 40.3
2-Core 81.6
36% 57.8 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 140
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5750
XFX(1682 2980) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
8.96% Terrible
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 9.46
Parallax 9.88
10% 10.3 fps
MRender 8.95
Gravity 8.47
Splatting 11
8% 9.46 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.96%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
523GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 92 94 130 139 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 154
Write 146
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 118
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$23
17GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 87 88 88 85 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 79
Write 76.7
Mixed 46
SusWrite 85.2
53% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 69%
Apple iPod 8GB
6GB free, PID 1266
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 13 13 12 13 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
4.25% Terrible
Read 9
Write 10
Mixed 8
SusWrite 12
14% 9.75 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.25%
Great: 5%
WDC WD10 EACS-00D6B0 1TB
537GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
8.92% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 13
Mixed 14
SusWrite 12.5
18% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.92%
Great: 40%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB
496GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
4.82% Terrible
Read 15
Write 13.5
Mixed 17
SusWrite 1.6
15% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 4.82%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.8% Poor
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 8
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 7100 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 7100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $36
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback