Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion g4 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Pavilion g4 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 165E
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120323
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 03 '19 at 17:22
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-1800 APU (2012 M.Za)
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 20.9
2-Core 38.1
36% 46.5 Pts
4-Core 40.7
8-Core 41.6
6% 41.2 Pts
64-Core 37
2% 37 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7340G
HP(103C 165E) 384MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.950.0.0
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
0.46% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.75
0% 0.72 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 1.17
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.46%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$25
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 75 74 77 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 73.2
Write 76.5
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 75.1
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 50%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
6GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.5 3.2 3.5 3.3 3.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
4.19% Terrible
Read 20.4
Write 5
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 3.4
9% 8.57 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.19%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CK0 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 4.1
10% 3.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.63 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion g4 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 659 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion g4 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $82
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback