IBM 94Y7614

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIBM 94Y7614  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140507
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJan 08 '19 at 19:16
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 69.4
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 182
64% 114 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 603
57% 474 Pts
64-Core 1,285
80% 1,285 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
EVGA(3842 2713) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Lighting 4.53
Reflection 4.38
Parallax 4.38
4% 4.43 fps
MRender 4.57
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.09
4% 4.85 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 1TB
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 80 90 88 94 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 256
Write 59.5
Mixed 640
SusWrite 85.1
59% 260 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 54.9
192% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 175
147% 212 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 153%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 18 slots used
32GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
39.3% Below average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback