Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190627
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 15 '19 at 23:17
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 81.2
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 918
82% 692 Pts
64-Core 1,284
80% 1,284 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 2110 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 72.9
Parallax 96.4
0% 56.5 fps
MRender 75
Gravity 79.4
Splatting 60.2
57% 71.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SPCCSolidStateDisk 512GB
446GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQE1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 131 120 127 117 135 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.6% Below average
Read 165
Write 102
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 129
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 7.3
53% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 60.5
84% 154 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 84%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 1TB
950GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 534 515 525 527 449 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 997
Write 1,167
Mixed 1,128
SusWrite 459
211% 938 MB/s
4K Read 75.1
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 71.4
248% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 186
141% 190 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 153%
Great: 153%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 266 262 269 194 261 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 947
Write 1,303
Mixed 1,092
SusWrite 257
203% 900 MB/s
4K Read 69.3
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 63
223% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 170
129% 174 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 130%
Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$50
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 32.5
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 35.7
SC Mixed 27.7
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 639 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback