Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory120.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 09 '19 at 20:50
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 207
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 835
73% 623 Pts
64-Core 1,643
102% 1,643 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 181
Parallax 168
141% 174 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 152
Splatting 117
105% 129 fps
Poor: 108%
This bench: 123%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210
587GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 383 381 384 382 379 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 414
Write 440
Mixed 374
SusWrite 383
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 37
137% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 342
259% 347 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 124%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 189 190 191 191 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 196
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 190
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 181 181 182 182 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 195
Mixed 93
SusWrite 181
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
214% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 185 184 186 186 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 195
Mixed 92.3
SusWrite 186
120% 164 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$194
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 100 101 99 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 155
Write 146
Mixed 95.2
SusWrite 99
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 98%
Multi-Reader -1 64GB
58GB free, PID 6368
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 89.5
Write 83
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 86
104% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 4.6
302% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40BB0-CPB 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 55.7
MC Write 52.3
MC Mixed 45.8
146% 51.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 17.2
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 126%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $770
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback