Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics65.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '19 at 21:26
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 196
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 497
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65.5% Good
Lighting 82.5
Reflection 87.6
Parallax 77.4
67% 82.5 fps
MRender 82.9
Gravity 77.3
Splatting 69.8
62% 76.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SVP200S 90GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 69 70 68 73 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 119
Write 95
Mixed 118
SusWrite 70.5
23% 101 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 21.7
87% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 88.2
DQ Mixed 21.9
42% 85.6 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 51%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
35GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 153 153 152 153 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 474
Write 463
Mixed 367
SusWrite 185
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 41.4
134% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 43.5
99% 199 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 115%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
146GB free
Firmware: 1D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 65 67 67 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 116
Write 110
Mixed 100
SusWrite 66.4
73% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 76%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
23GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 33
Write 26.8
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 27.5
35% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-447.A00LF 9905403-447.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 30.9
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.7
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,725 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback