Asus P8H61-M LE/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M LE/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111021
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '19 at 19:29
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 85.6 1-Core 86.2 2-Core 171 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 355 44% 338 Pts	64-Core 345 21% 345 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 853F) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	58% Above average	Lighting 73 Reflection 73 Parallax 66.9 60% 71 fps	MRender 80.8 Gravity 64.8 Splatting 60.1 55% 68.6 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 54%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 251 Write 224 Mixed 229 52% 235 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 50.3 4K Mixed 37.5 122% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 196 147% 197 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 554GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 3,374 Write 48.3 Mixed 92.7 840% 1,172 MB/s	4K Read 632 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 3.9 26,800% 212 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 825GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 3,352 Write 15.8 Mixed 59.3 775% 1,142 MB/s	4K Read 632 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.2 2,458% 212 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-2400C11-8GXM 16GB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	49.6% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 16.2 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 14.7 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M LE/USB3 Builds (Compare 633 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE/USB3

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	78x
Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	69x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	66x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	71x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	46x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	39x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x

RAM
99U5471-020.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,112 samples	8x
99U5471-012.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,159 samples	8x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16