Performance Results


Gaming 83% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	97% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180619
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 04 '19 at 18:40
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Memory 79.5 1-Core 125 2-Core 246 83% 150 Pts	4-Core 484 8-Core 782 78% 633 Pts	64-Core 974 60% 974 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% MSI(1462 C307) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.81 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	97% Outstanding	Lighting 125 Reflection 136 Parallax 128 102% 130 fps	MRender 96.6 Gravity 122 Splatting 104 88% 108 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 122 129 130 131 131 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 488 Mixed 330 SusWrite 155 82% 369 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 53.1 185% 66.1 MB/s	DQ Read 40.2 DQ Write 95.3 DQ Mixed 52.3 44% 62.6 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 110%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 385GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2230 626 609 607 609 609 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	243% Outstanding	Read 2,520 Write 2,306 Mixed 1,631 SusWrite 882 410% 1,835 MB/s	4K Read 62.4 4K Write 139 4K Mixed 78.8 269% 93.3 MB/s	DQ Read 59.3 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 625 324% 270 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 243% Great: 340%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 110 109 109 109 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Read 142 Write 111 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 109 69% 95.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905702-027.A00G 2x8GB 618 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.5% Above average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.1 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 16.8 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 81.5 49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 80%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 75%

Battleship

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	157x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	107x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	106x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	241x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	223x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	218x

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $451

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16