Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-4600M APU 5,886 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Memory 73.4 1-Core 42.4 2-Core 74.3 42% 63.4 Pts	4-Core 120 8-Core 130 16% 125 Pts	64-Core 142 9% 142 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660G 4,227 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Acer(1025 0697) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.152.0.0 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	4.71% Terrible	Lighting 5.77 Reflection 6.92 Parallax 6 5% 6.23 fps	MRender 4.43 Gravity 5.27 Splatting 7.04 5% 5.58 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.71% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 391 Mixed 224 66% 308 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 41 4K Mixed 24.7 84% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 25.5 DQ Write 52.3 DQ Mixed 33 27% 36.9 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AD73I1C1674EV PSD34G13332S 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.8% Below average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 11 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 7.9 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 93.7 43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x
SSD2SC480G1CS2754D117-514 480GBPNYBench 89%, 1,168 samples	1x
830 256GBSamsung $261Bench 72%, 25,763 samples	1x

RAM
NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG NT2GC64B88G0NS-CG 6GBNanyaBench 39%, 388 samples	3x
ACR512X64D3S16C11G 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 370 samples	2x
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 26%, 5,316 samples	2x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16