Hp-pavilion AW019AV-ABA e9250t

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHp-pavilion AW019AV-ABA e9250t  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI Indio
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091127
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateAug 02 '16 at 00:47
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 139
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 248
31% 236 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
EVGA(3842 2712) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5921
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.49% Terrible
Lighting 0.17
Reflection 4.31
Parallax 3.72
0% 2.73 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 6.17
4% 4.86 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.49%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
563GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 109
Write 118
Mixed 115
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.26
4K Mixed 0.29
112% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 83%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 44.8
Write 40.5
Mixed 34.2
30% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.03
4K Write 0.37
4K Mixed 0.05
13% 0.15 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 57%
WDC WD50 00BEVT-22ZAT0 500GB
460GB free, PID 110c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 24.6
Mixed 24.8
33% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.26
67% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CE80CE80 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM SDRAM 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 13.6
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AW019AV-ABA e9250t Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion AW019AV-ABA e9250t

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $72
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback