bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2554 x 1133 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '19 at 20:16
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core i7-6700K
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 125
2-Core 246
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 251
34% 250 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 256MB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.15.1.60
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.11% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.15
Parallax 0.12
0% 0.13 fps
MRender 0.29
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 0.22
0% 0.21 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.11%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 69GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.1 5.9 7 5.5 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 57.8
Write 8.6
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 6.8
17% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
76.3% Very good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 25.7
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 22.1
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback