QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory11.7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 11.7GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory7.8 GB free of 11.7188 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateApr 22 '18 at 23:57
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core i7-6700K
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 81.3
1-Core 121
2-Core 231
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 484
64% 483 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
PowerColor(148C 2358) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Lighting 66.4
Reflection 59.3
Parallax 80.8
54% 68.8 fps
MRender 60.3
Gravity 54.6
Splatting 77.9
54% 64.3 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 960GB
878GB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 486
Write 420
Mixed 440
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 24
91% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 59.4
107% 209 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 78%
Qemu HARDDISK 322GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 65%
Red Hat VirtIO 734GB
24GB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: Unknown
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 441
Mixed 486
105% 471 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 30.2
102% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 21
90% 203 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x11GB
1 of 1 slots used
11GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
65% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 20.1
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback