Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
MotherboardGigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '19 at 05:29
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 88.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 272
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 830
85% 689 Pts
64-Core 1,121
69% 1,121 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2825) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
35.1% Below average
Lighting 41.9
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 51.3
34% 44.2 fps
MRender 53.8
Gravity 49.2
Splatting 36.3
37% 46.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 36%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.94% Terrible
Lighting 6.43
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 8.59
5% 8.71 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 7.37
Splatting 15.5
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.94%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 29 27 30 33 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 441
Write 126
Mixed 119
SusWrite 37
39% 181 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 18.7
104% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 82.9
DQ Mixed 49.5
76% 150 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
472GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 192 193 192 192 192 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 103
Write 81.5
Mixed 73
SusWrite 192
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4-2133 CL15 8GB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.5% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 19.6
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 22.6
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 7,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $172

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback