Clevo P170EM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemClevo P170EM  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO P170EM
Memory12.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '16 at 01:40
Run Duration88 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 166
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 425
45% 359 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Clevo(1558 7102) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.951.6.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 2.78
3% 3.83 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.48
4% 5.14 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
50% Average
Read 81.9
Write 92.6
Mixed 79.6
64% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 0.59
4K Mixed 0.14
37% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 50%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.C16 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 859B CT102464BF160B.C16 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17.1
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P170EM Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo P170EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $638
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback