Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100 9,911 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	36.8% Below average	Memory 58.3 1-Core 24.6 2-Core 45.6 30% 42.8 Pts	4-Core 85.6 8-Core 117 13% 101 Pts	64-Core 122 8% 122 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000M 4,288 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Dell(1028 153E) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 327.62 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	3.79% Terrible	Lighting 4.5 Reflection 5.4 Parallax 4.7 4% 4.87 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 4.8 4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.79% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate BarraCuda Q1 SSD 240GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: STWS SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 145 118 123 115 122 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.6% Poor	Read 233 Write 14 Mixed 37.8 SusWrite 106 21% 97.9 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 4.1 19% 5.47 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 88%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 125GB free Firmware: 04MH SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 195 181 200 199 192 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.5% Poor	Read 229 Write 174 Mixed 183 SusWrite 190 44% 194 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 7.8 28% 7.87 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.C16 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 859B CT102464BF160B.C16 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 24GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	40.7% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 15.7 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 6.2 16% 5.77 GB/s	Latency 133 30% 133 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	178x
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	138x
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples	86x

SSD
PM830 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 63%, 9,379 samples	30x
MX500 1TBCrucial $84Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x

RAM
X7C75G-HYC 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 524 samples	32x
M471B1G73BH0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 51%, 1,654 samples	15x
X7C75G-HYC 2x4GBKingstonBench 58%, 334 samples	11x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $220