Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä, , 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit väriä, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '19 at 22:03
Run Duration392 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 96.9
1-Core 160
2-Core 321
105% 193 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 839
91% 721 Pts
64-Core 861
53% 861 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 104%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.74% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 13
Parallax 9.25
7% 10.4 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 18
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.74%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 152
Parallax 129
114% 140 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 124
Splatting 112
95% 117 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 874 617 549 424 399 396 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 2,053
Write 1707
Mixed 640
SusWrite 543
274% 1,236 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 65.6
243% 94.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,071
DQ Write 1,156
DQ Mixed 842
709% 1,023 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 239%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
338GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 475 466 469 473 481 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 483
Mixed 452
SusWrite 473
108% 477 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 58
193% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 350
266% 359 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 125%
Great: 122%
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLV128 128GB
47GB free
Firmware: BXV7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 146 146 146 147 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 787
Write 152
Mixed 200
SusWrite 147
70% 322 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 30.4
184% 74.7 MB/s
DQ Read 556
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 231
202% 313 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 110%
Great: 311%
Corsair Force 3 240GB-$232
74GB free
Firmware: 5.05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 136 140 143 140 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 158
Write 208
Mixed 169
SusWrite 143
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 37.5
145% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 87.4
94% 157 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 67%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
233GB free
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 907 905 905 902 901 906 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2,064
Write 915
Mixed 738
SusWrite 904
255% 1,155 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 60.3
251% 98.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,054
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 370
356% 582 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 245%
Great: 243%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
58GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 309 309 308 307 306 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 490
Mixed 393
SusWrite 327
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 60.2
206% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 354
268% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 120%
Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
441GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1434 1212 1201 1202 1199 1195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
299% Outstanding
Read 2,140
Write 1,805
Mixed 898
SusWrite 1,241
340% 1,521 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 69.4
255% 99.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,408
DQ Write 1,282
DQ Mixed 1,025
857% 1,238 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 299%
Great: 302%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
247GB free
Firmware: 2BA3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 83 82 84 85 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 83.5
Write 53.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 82.4
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 59%
JMicron 5TB
845GB free
Firmware: 4207
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 79 85 85 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 63
Write 83.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 83.5
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.5
147% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 75%
Kingston SUV400S37960G 960GB
343GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 477 464 184 130 109 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 73% Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 32GB
3220, 3220, 3220, 3220 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 32.3
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 45.3
SC Mixed 28.8
94% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 50.5
79% 50.5 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $995
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback