Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 106% UFO	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 125% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	62.8 GB free of 80 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170914
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '19 at 03:14
Run Duration	295 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7940X-$654 4,560 User benchmarks, average bench 83% CPU0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Memory 72 1-Core 124 2-Core 247 80% 148 Pts	4-Core 489 8-Core 934 85% 712 Pts	64-Core 2,149 133% 2,149 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	127% Outstanding	Lighting 176 Reflection 196 Parallax 191 143% 187 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 177 Splatting 124 115% 142 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 148GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 850 869 823 774 732 695 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	244% Outstanding	Read 2,188 Write 1,316 Mixed 757 SusWrite 790 279% 1,263 MB/s	4K Read 43.1 4K Write 135 4K Mixed 61 215% 79.7 MB/s	DQ Read 972 DQ Write 899 DQ Mixed 828 651% 900 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 244% Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 405GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 431 446 444 450 452 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 475 Write 467 Mixed 329 SusWrite 434 96% 426 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 90.4 4K Mixed 42 148% 54.3 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 348 264% 356 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 2TB-$320 2,669 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 2TB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 431 446 444 450 452 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	94.8% Outstanding	Read 304 Write 327 Mixed 314 SusWrite 434 78% 345 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 56.6 4K Mixed 44 126% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 351 265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 130%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 3.5TB free Firmware: AR17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 187 188 189 188 188 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2TB free Firmware: AR17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 115 122 122 122 119 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate ST12000NE0007-2GT116 12TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 16.5TB free Firmware: EN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 157 148 128 129 91 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 216 Write 99.5 Mixed 89 SusWrite 135 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.3 544% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 109%
SanDisk SDSSDXPS480G 480GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 6GB free, PID 5106 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	7.17% Terrible	Read 16.8 Write 18.3 Mixed 18.3 SusWrite 18.7 25% 18 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 14% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.17% Great: 164%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 2.5TB free, PID 5106 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 37 36 36 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 38.1 Write 39.1 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 36.5 46% 34 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 24% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2666C15D4/8G KHX2666C15D4/8G KHX2666C15D4/8G KHX2666C15D4/8G KHX2400C15/16G KHX2666C15D4/8G KHX2400C15/16G KHX2666C15D4/8G 80GB 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2400, 2666, 2400, 2666 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	79.6% Very good	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 40.1 MC Mixed 29 90% 31.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 10 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 96.9 41% 96.9 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 110%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

CPU
Core i9-7900XIntel $400Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	72x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	68x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	56x
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	36x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $154Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	14x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	93x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	41x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $885

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16