ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-S1

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-S1 (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140110
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '16 at 00:17
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135 19,875 User benchmarks, average bench 45% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Memory 50.9 1-Core 63.4 2-Core 93.2 42% 69.2 Pts	4-Core 156 8-Core 149 20% 152 Pts	64-Core 165 10% 165 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Gigabyte(1458 226D) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2211.0 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.6% Poor	Lighting 31.8 Reflection 29.2 Parallax 40.3 26% 33.8 fps	MRender 26.6 Gravity 28.7 Splatting 34.7 25% 30 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
MK0060EAVDR 60GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3C32HPG6 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 35630 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 319 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 39 (B4) Unknown 100 100 177899 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 82 82 23 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 1 1 177899 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 100 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 99 0 (CB) Run out cancel 82 82 14	23.1% Poor	Read 149 Write 108 Mixed 101 26% 120 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 13 4K Mixed 7.62 32% 10.2 MB/s	DQ Read 17.1 DQ Write 21 DQ Mixed 10.7 10% 16.3 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 38%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 162GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 23233 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 83 82 5358 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1229 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7599 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1273 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 6 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 48 223339151391 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 97 8 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 238 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 110 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1313	53.8% Above average	Read 85.6 Write 102 Mixed 45.6 57% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.19 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.17 44% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 2x8GB 760 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 13.8 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.4 GB/s	Latency 157 25% 157 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GA-F2A55M-S1 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-S1

CPU
Athlon II X4 740KAMDBench 49%, 4,318 samples	12x
A4-4000 APUAMD $171Bench 39%, 6,528 samples	10x
A4-6300 APUAMD $51Bench 40%, 10,924 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	7x
Radeon R7 250AMDBench 9%, 5,461 samples	5x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	2x

SSD
GP-GSTFS31120GN 120GBGigabyteBench 68%, 187 samples	3x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
99U5474-016.A 99U5584-007.A 8GBKingstonBench 33%, 17 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 39%, 4,786 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback