Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A55M-S1  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140110
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 01 '16 at 00:17
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Memory 50.9
1-Core 63.4
2-Core 93.2
42% 69.2 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 149
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
Gigabyte(1458 226D) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2211.0
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.6% Poor
Lighting 31.8
Reflection 29.2
Parallax 40.3
26% 33.8 fps
MRender 26.6
Gravity 28.7
Splatting 34.7
25% 30 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MK0060EAVDR 60GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3C32HPG6 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 149
Write 108
Mixed 101
26% 120 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 7.62
32% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 17.1
DQ Write 21
DQ Mixed 10.7
10% 16.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 38%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
162GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 85.6
Write 102
Mixed 45.6
57% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.19
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.17
44% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
31.3% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 13.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.7
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 157
25% 157 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A55M-S1 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback