Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S7  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3099-A1
Memory44.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '19 at 06:55
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2470 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 116
54% 86 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 592
54% 454 Pts
64-Core 1,513
94% 1,513 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 444 442 442 442 439 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 498
Write 444
Mixed 418
SusWrite 443
101% 451 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 27.6
104% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 47.3
73% 137 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 100%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 64GB
21GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 11 11 12 8.4 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
7.32% Terrible
Read 30.3
Write 7.8
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 10.5
21% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.32%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 6x8GB
6 of 12 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
89% Excellent
MC Read 51.6
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 29.2
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 5.3
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 89%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIMERGY TX200 S7 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback