Asus G75VW

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus G75VW (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G75VW
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120406
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '19 at 15:10
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	60.5% Good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 77.8 2-Core 149 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 289 31% 249 Pts	64-Core 335 21% 335 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670M 2,951 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 2119) 3GB CLim: 650 MHz, MLim: 825 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.31% Terrible	Lighting 1.53 Reflection 1.73 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.25 fps	MRender 2.14 Gravity 0.93 Splatting 2.04 1% 1.71 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 1.31% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$160 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 191 203 205 228 278 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 411 Write 147 Mixed 214 SusWrite 215 55% 247 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 39.9 4K Mixed 24.2 86% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 249 198% 281 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 134%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 168GB free Firmware: 2BA30001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 50 51 51 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	34% Below average	Read 67.7 Write 52.5 Mixed 46 SusWrite 50.6 40% 54.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F M471B5173QH0-YK0 Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.4% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.6 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 11.9 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 75.3 53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G75VW Builds (Compare 619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G75VW

CPU
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	347x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	248x
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 660MNvidiaBench 7%, 7,381 samples	342x
GTX 670MNvidiaBench 10%, 2,951 samples	275x
GeForce GTX 770NvidiaBench 9%, 2 samples	1x

SSD
LAT-256M3S 256GBLiteonitBench 75%, 575 samples	30x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 48%, 3,420 samples	66x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 53%, 1,421 samples	61x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $300

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16