Today's hottest deals

Asus G75VW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G75VW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G75VW
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130107
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 01 '20 at 19:14
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 176
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 436
44% 360 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670M
Asus(1043 2119) 3GB
CLim: 620 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 13.2
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 11.6
11% 13.4 fps
MRender 16.7
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 13
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
228GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 414 420 419 418 420 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 13.7
Mixed 163
SusWrite 421
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 33.5
105% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 286
238% 344 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 94%
Great: 125%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
419GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 79 78 80 80 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 64.6
Write 55.5
Mixed 30
SusWrite 78.9
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
86% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 17.7
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G75VW Builds (Compare 641 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G75VW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback