Today's hottest deals

Clevo P170EM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemClevo P170EM  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO P170EM
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '22 at 10:44
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User GHA-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
45.7% Average
Memory 71.9
1-Core 51.9
2-Core 80.6
45% 68.1 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 156
17% 132 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670M
Clevo(1558 7102) 1.5GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
7.31% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 10.2
5% 9.83 fps
MRender 16.3
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 13.9
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.31%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST250LT003-9YG14C 250GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003DEM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 26 35 29 9.5 9.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 41.2
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 21.7
25% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
61% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 44%
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$50
117GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 68 67 66 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 60.5
Write 33.1
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 67.6
37% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
39.2% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P170EM Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo P170EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $638
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback