PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Gigabyte A320M-S2H |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20180808 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 01 '19 at 16:24 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
78%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.39
|
36.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 253 248 241 237 234 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
|||
KINGSTON SA400S37240G 240GB
136GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 304 248 84 126 64 MB/s
|
240%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD2 CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBR1 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
78.2%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 817x |
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 783x |
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 746x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 772x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 447x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 414x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $423 |