Medion MS-7848

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	63.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	92.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Medion MS-7848 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION MS-7848
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130923
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	May 21 '19 at 22:32
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	90%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$99 81,111 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	65.4% Good	Memory 80 1-Core 89.5 2-Core 181 68% 117 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 300 40% 297 Pts	64-Core 333 21% 333 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3775) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Lighting 79 Reflection 78.6 Parallax 75.1 64% 77.5 fps	MRender 71.5 Gravity 74.5 Splatting 76.4 61% 74.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$90 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 809GB free (System drive) Firmware: R060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 440 418 380 379 374 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Read 317 Write 469 Mixed 367 SusWrite 396 88% 387 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 81.2 4K Mixed 37.6 130% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 344 258% 344 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 105%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 208GB free Firmware: 3J SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 96 96 96 96 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Read 112 Write 106 Mixed 37 SusWrite 95.4 64% 87.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 57%
ST1000DM 003-1CH162 1TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 92GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 0.2 0.2 0 0.1 4.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	33% Below average	Read 184 Write 153 Mixed 93.6 SusWrite 1.5 130% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 70%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 493GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 86 93 92 93 94 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Read 135 Write 135 Mixed 59.3 SusWrite 89.1 136% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 47%
ST2000DM 001-1E6164 2TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 506GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.2 0.2 0 0.1 12 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 113 Write 117 Mixed 70 SusWrite 2.1 94% 75.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 0.7 291% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 67%
WDC WD20 EARS-22MVWB0 2TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 93 92 93 94 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 102 Write 116 Mixed 41.2 SusWrite 90.3 116% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 30% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 36%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 495GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 0.9 0.3 0 0.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	31% Below average	Read 174 Write 143 Mixed 38.7 SusWrite 1.9 102% 89.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 67%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA400 4TB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 37GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0 0 0.1 0.2 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	Read 92.4 Write 95.1 Mixed 42.2 SusWrite 16.9 77% 61.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 105% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 1x8GB 1,467 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 9.3 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 8.7 26% 9.07 GB/s	Latency 80.6 50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7848 Builds (Compare 688 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: Medion MS-7848

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	192x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	176x
Core i5-4440Intel $99Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	134x

GPU
GTX 760 (192-bit)NvidiaBench 20%, 10,656 samples	99x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	47x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	42x

SSD
MX100 256GBCrucial $116Bench 83%, 55,768 samples	50x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	28x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	20x

RAM
M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 55%, 1,721 samples	106x
M2F8G64CB8HC5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 54%, 1,156 samples	53x
M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI 2x4GBNanyaBench 53%, 1,438 samples	51x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $251

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16