Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 78.7 1-Core 105 2-Core 179 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 476 51% 406 Pts	64-Core 519 32% 519 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	3.49% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 5.46 Parallax 5.03 3% 4.73 fps	MRender 6.62 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 6.7 4% 5.26 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.49% Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.7% Above average	Lighting 64.4 Reflection 65.9 Parallax 55.8 52% 62 fps	MRender 70.4 Gravity 65.7 Splatting 60.3 53% 65.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin Chronos 90GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 504ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 60 64 63 62 59 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.1% Below average	Read 111 Write 84.8 Mixed 93.5 SusWrite 62.7 20% 88 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 58.9 4K Mixed 18.1 68% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 95.5 DQ Mixed 66.9 61% 94.7 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 75%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$49 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 116GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 223 228 215 224 233 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	70.7% Very good	Read 256 Write 240 Mixed 238 SusWrite 224 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 70.2 4K Mixed 34.9 124% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 173 134% 183 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 125%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 277GB free Firmware: AX001A SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 96 95 95 97 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 72.5 Write 77 Mixed 31 SusWrite 95.4 50% 69 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 24GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.1% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 13.5 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 13 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 83 48% 83 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	126x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	76x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	70x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	31x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	30x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	25x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $337

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16