| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus Commando (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20081222 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 17 '19 at 21:56 |
| Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Extreme X9650-$850
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
|
46.3%
Average
|
41% 63.8 Pts
|
22% 161 Pts
|
9% 152 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2990) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.9%
Below average
|
33% 39 fps
|
36% 45.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 171 181 106 54 52 MB/s
|
37.6%
Below average
|
32% 142 MB/s
|
71% 24.7 MB/s
|
21% 30.2 MB/s
|
|
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
465GB free
Firmware: CR100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 78 78 77 77 MB/s
|
43.7%
Average
|
51% 69.8 MB/s
|
136% 0.87 MB/s
| |
|
PNY U3 500GB
443GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.4 4.9 6.6 10 8.3 MB/s
|
5.81%
Terrible
|
9% 6.4 MB/s
|
56% 0.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
16% 5.67 GB/s
|
14% 4.8 GB/s
|
35% 113 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Commando Builds (Compare 27 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus Commando
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 QuadIntel $90Bench 43%, 5,765 samples | 7x |
| Core2 6600Intel $90Bench 37%, 8,894 samples | 3x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 3x |
| HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 2x |
| GTX 570Nvidia $350Bench 20%, 22,303 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $295 |