Today's hottest deals

Asus Rampage Extreme

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Rampage Extreme  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080923
Uptime31.3 Days
Run DateAug 19 '21 at 18:53
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Extreme X9650-$850
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.2% Average
Memory 58.7
1-Core 34.4
2-Core 71.7
36% 54.9 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 164
20% 156 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
Asus(1043 83B0) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.87% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 1.8
2% 3.3 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 5
Splatting 3.8
4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.87%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 7Y250M0 1TB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 42 41 51 50 53 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 173
Write 51.2
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 48.4
19% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 9.1
34% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 16.6
DQ Write 52.3
DQ Mixed 19.9
19% 29.6 MB/s
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$40
571GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 51 53 53 52 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 93.5
Write 48.8
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 50.1
45% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 2.2
405% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
20.7% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.7
21% 7.3 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 31.5" 1280 720 MEIA296 Panasonic-TV
Typical Rampage Extreme Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Rampage Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback