Asrock H81M-VG4 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H81M-VG4 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150723
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '19 at 11:39
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	72%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3260 9,453 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Memory 42.4 1-Core 91.9 2-Core 147 52% 93.7 Pts	4-Core 128 8-Core 175 19% 152 Pts	64-Core 178 11% 178 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Zotac(19DA 1314) 3GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.2% Above average	Lighting 59.7 Reflection 62.5 Parallax 85.3 49% 69.2 fps	MRender 78.2 Gravity 73.1 Splatting 50 53% 67.1 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 108 62 56 62 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 309 Write 274 Mixed 87.9 SusWrite 81 42% 188 MB/s	4K Read 8.5 4K Write 28.6 4K Mixed 11.7 43% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 91.5 DQ Mixed 108 96% 149 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 82%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 125GB free Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 233 79 72 46 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 309 Write 219 Mixed 189 SusWrite 118 46% 209 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 27.9 4K Mixed 15.4 75% 23.3 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 1.2 63% 148 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown WLA304G08-EDJ6B 2x4GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.5% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 13.1 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 11.9 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 191 21% 191 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-VG4 R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-VG4 R2.0

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	251x
Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples	142x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	119x

GPU
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	131x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	119x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	86x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	72x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	48x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	35x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	26x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	25x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $222

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16