MSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive378% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A94
MotherboardMSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)  (all builds)
Memory59 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180801
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 29 '19 at 03:23
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9960X-$1,579
CPU0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 81.2
1-Core 131
2-Core 262
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 1,026
92% 774 Pts
64-Core 2,815
174% 2,815 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
MSI(1462 3722) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 166
Parallax 161
142% 167 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 144
Splatting 108
114% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2065 2133 2004 2140 2132 2135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
378% Outstanding
Read 2,478
Write 2,187
Mixed 1,421
SusWrite 2,102
460% 2047 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 205
4K Mixed 90.4
312% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,300
DQ Write 1,104
DQ Mixed 1,172
886% 1,192 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 378%
Great: 393%
Marvell Raid VD 240GB
48GB free
Firmware: MV.R00-0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 638 142 140 139 138 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 710
Write 746
Mixed 518
SusWrite 222
123% 549 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 50.7
169% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 404
DQ Mixed 375
284% 380 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
128GB free
Firmware: PB4OC64G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 62 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 70.5
Write 72.7
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 61.5
45% 61 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 45%
Apple HDD HTS541010A9E662 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JA0AB5D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 96 99 99 98 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 99.5
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 98.2
60% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 59%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
2GB free, PID a81d, Lexar 8G
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
7.07% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 6.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 11
12% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.07%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3333 C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 57.6
MC Mixed 38.6
128% 44.7 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 10.6
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 111%
Great: 185%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94) Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $798
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback