Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 645 5,346 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Memory 72.7 1-Core 40 2-Core 83.2 43% 65.3 Pts	4-Core 119 8-Core 147 17% 133 Pts	64-Core 133 8% 133 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9200 1,231 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0228) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	0.42% Terrible	Lighting 0.37 Reflection 0.96 Parallax 0.22 0% 0.52 fps	MRender 1.29 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 0.78 1% 0.82 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.42% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 722GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 56 48 52 67 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 75.2 Write 59 Mixed 26.7 SusWrite 55.7 40% 54.1 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.1 24% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 59%
Multiple Flash Reader 32GB 187 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 0GB free, PID 6361 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 4.2 5 5.9 3.4 2.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	4.82% Terrible	Read 16.5 Write 4.7 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 4.4 9% 7.78 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 26% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.82% Great: 18%
Innostor Innostor 16GB 2,388 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 1GB free, PID 0917 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 11 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	6.78% Terrible	Read 30.8 Write 11.3 Mixed 14.7 SusWrite 10.4 20% 16.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.9 31% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.78% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 2x2GB 3,379 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.2% Poor	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 9 26% 8.93 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 1.9 12% 4.17 GB/s	Latency 95.3 42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II X2 220AMDBench 39%, 5,045 samples	7x
Phenom II X6 1035TAMDBench 53%, 2,528 samples	6x
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	4x
GeForce 9200NvidiaBench 1%, 1,231 samples	4x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	3x

SSD
Burst Elite 120GBPatriotBench 38%, 3 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x
Ultra II 120GBSanDisk $76Bench 76%, 9,139 samples	1x

RAM
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 Unifosa GU512303EP0202 Unifosa GU512303EP0202 8GBKingstonBench 37%, 5 samples	2x
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 31%, 1,517 samples	1x
9905471-001.A00LF 2x2GBKingstonBench 39%, 663 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16