Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 65% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	86.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190425
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 03 '19 at 19:31
Run Duration	268 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 70.3 1-Core 97.8 2-Core 196 68% 121 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 766 69% 579 Pts	64-Core 992 61% 992 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 113 Parallax 94.8 88% 105 fps	MRender 97.9 Gravity 101 Splatting 101 82% 100 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,870 Write 1,499 Mixed 552 288% 1307 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 92.6 4K Mixed 47 166% 59 MB/s	DQ Read 431 DQ Write 512 DQ Mixed 515 376% 486 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
OCZ ARC 100 480GB-$70 1,835 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 175GB free Firmware: 1.01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 432 377 437 374 433 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	90% Excellent	Read 399 Write 441 Mixed 304 SusWrite 415 88% 390 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 72 4K Mixed 32.3 118% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 232 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 221 183% 260 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 101%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 138GB free Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 77 75 90 75 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Read 440 Write 459 Mixed 330 SusWrite 142 77% 343 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 79.4 4K Mixed 28.6 120% 45.2 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 106 116% 187 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 100%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 250GB 1,970 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 232GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 153 154 151 149 147 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 395 Write 160 Mixed 217 SusWrite 151 51% 231 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 4 53% 12.2 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 189 182 186 184 188 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 135 Mixed 85.5 SusWrite 186 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 114%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB 4,943 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 763GB free Firmware: 0708 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 91 88 91 102 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 81.8 Write 77.5 Mixed 98 SusWrite 94 66% 87.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.4 155% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 64%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 14GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 8.5 9.6 8.4 9.9 8.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 36.7 Write 6.7 Mixed 19.5 SusWrite 8.3 20% 17.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 3.5 237% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB 8,488 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (60^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.9% Very good	MC Read 27.6 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 24.9 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 19.1 SC Write 28.3 SC Mixed 22.9 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)