Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171204
Uptime8 Days
Run DateJul 04 '19 at 08:26
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 72.1
1-Core 93.3
2-Core 188
66% 118 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 339
47% 349 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 37.1
32% 35.8 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 36.2
30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 310 314 321 319 317 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 456
Write 314
Mixed 282
SusWrite 322
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 27.9
125% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 257
203% 281 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 133%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
643GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 92 92 93 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 96.7
Write 93.5
Mixed 75
SusWrite 91.6
66% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HTS725025A9A362 250GB
210GB free
Firmware: PC2OC70E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 99 100 100 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 108
Write 98.5
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 99.2
66% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 32.3
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 25.4
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 96.5
41% 96.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,070 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $347
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback