Gigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics39.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemGigabyte Z370M AORUS Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 08 '19 at 17:05
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-8700K-$355
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
1-Core 132
2-Core 264
93% 198 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 808
80% 638 Pts
64-Core 949
64% 949 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$685
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (141 fps cap detected)
39.5% Below average
Lighting 142
Reflection 142
Parallax 141
37% 142 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 142
Splatting 142
43% 141 fps
Poor: 89%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 141%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$110
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 182 154 157 106 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 406
Write 367
Mixed 295
SusWrite 173
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 22.6
106% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 187
163% 243 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$124
765GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 114 113 115 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 106
Write 107
Mixed 59
SusWrite 114
71% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$89
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 101 106 93 72 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 84.3
Write 132
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 98.3
71% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.7
212% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.6
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 12.4
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 93%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $616
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $344Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback