Gigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemGigabyte Z370M AORUS Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 08 '19 at 17:05
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-8700K-$350
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
SC Int 124
SC Float 136
SC Mixed 132
105% 131 Pts
QC Int 455
QC Float 459
QC Mixed 467
104% 460 Pts
MC Int 897
MC Float 1,093
MC Mixed 949
146% 980 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$808
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (141 fps cap detected)
52.6% Above average
Lighting 142
Reflection 142
Parallax 141
44% 142 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 142
Splatting 142
59% 141 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 175%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$128
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 182 154 157 106 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 406
Write 367
Mixed 295
SusWrite 173
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 22.6
106% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 187
163% 243 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$70
765GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 114 113 115 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 106
Write 107
Mixed 59
SusWrite 114
71% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$89
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 101 106 93 72 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 84.3
Write 132
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 98.3
71% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.7
212% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.6
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 12.4
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 96%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 950 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $625
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $248Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $70G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $607SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback