PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M4A87TD/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110308 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jul 15 '19 at 10:47 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | BLR-User |
Background CPU | 30% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 980
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
57.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.36
|
33.1%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 104 63 51 38 46 MB/s
|
40.8%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
468GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 114 64 59 32 53 MB/s
|
58.2%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown GR1333D364L9/2G000 GR1333D364L9/2G000 Kingston 99U5458-005.A00LF 8GB
667, 667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096 MB
|
28.3%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 41x |
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 24x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 22x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples | 8x |
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 6x |
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 6x |
SSD | |
---|---|
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples | 7x |
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples | 5x |
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $98 |