Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '19 at 20:31
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 75.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 246
80% 146 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 766
76% 623 Pts
64-Core 1,316
82% 1,316 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.6.3
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Lighting 69.7
Reflection 67.4
Parallax 89.9
57% 75.7 fps
MRender 70.4
Gravity 72.2
Splatting 58.7
54% 67.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE3600RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 54 56 55 55 45 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 430
Write 99.8
Mixed 124
SusWrite 52
38% 177 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 19.7
76% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 24.6
DQ Mixed 28.1
32% 56.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 55%
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-00000 256GB
98GB free
Firmware: MVT0200Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 302 296 299 301 287 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 492
Mixed 425
SusWrite 312
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 59
201% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 367
277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 118%
Great: 120%
Seagate ST3160811AS 160GB-$45
40GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 47 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 40.7
Mixed 40
SusWrite 46.8
36% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 40%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
5GB free
Firmware: 06.01D06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 36 40 44 45 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 44.2
Write 46.2
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 43.1
31% 41.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 42%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $549
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback