Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '19 at 20:31
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$215
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
83% 176 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 786
78% 623 Pts
64-Core 1,298
87% 1,298 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$170
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.6.3
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Lighting 209
Reflection 175
Parallax 288
55% 224 fps
MRender 148
Gravity 217
Splatting 135
59% 166 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 62%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE3600RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 54 56 55 55 45 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 430
Write 99.8
Mixed 124
SusWrite 52
38% 177 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 19.7
76% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 24.6
DQ Mixed 28.1
32% 56.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 52%
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-00000 256GB
98GB free
Firmware: MVT0200Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 302 296 299 301 287 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 492
Mixed 425
SusWrite 312
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 59
201% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 367
277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 118%
Great: 118%
Seagate ST3160811AS 160GB-$45
40GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 47 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 40.7
Mixed 40
SusWrite 46.8
36% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 40%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$20
5GB free
Firmware: 06.01D06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 36 40 44 45 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 44.2
Write 46.2
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 43.1
31% 41.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 42%
Great: 115%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,733 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $523
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback