HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory44.9 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '16 at 18:53
Run Duration305 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 75.8
2-Core 154
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 541
51% 424 Pts
64-Core 1,224
76% 1,224 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.6909
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
6.17% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 8.92
Parallax 6.25
6% 7.39 fps
MRender 9.33
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 8.52
7% 8.65 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.17%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10365 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 242
Write 158
Mixed 189
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 11.3
52% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 12.3
DQ Write 30
DQ Mixed 7.82
10% 16.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36%
Great: 51%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
819GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 133
Write 144
Mixed 134
103% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.29
113% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 85%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 32GB-$13
21GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 25.6
Mixed 14.2
28% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.54
4K Write 0.65
4K Mixed 0.51
52% 1.56 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 33%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
15GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
7.81% Terrible
Read 30
Write 9.4
Mixed 8.89
16% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.85
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.004
22% 1.95 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.81%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 98 9965516-069.A00LF ID:01 98 9965516-069.A00LF ID:01 98 9965516-069.A00LF ID:01 98 9965516-069.A00LF ID:01 98 9965516-069.A00LF ID:01 98 9965516-069.A00LF 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.2% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 19.6
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback