PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P5G41T-M LX (all builds) |
Memory | 4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100622 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 26 '19 at 17:55 |
Run Duration | 186 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 38% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
|
44.6%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
|
30.7%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM02B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 51 49 47 31 40 MB/s
|
33.9%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
343GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 56 55 55 57 MB/s
|
66.4%
Good
|
|||
Hitachi HTS542512K9SA00 120GB-$25
44GB free
Firmware: BB2OC31P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 51 50 49 48 50 MB/s
|
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$20
270GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 56 55 55 57 MB/s
|
31.2%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD15 EVDS-73V9B0 1.5TB
636GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 18 17 MB/s
|
11.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Desktop 1TB
651GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 18 18 17 18 MB/s
|
11.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
18.2%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Pentium E5700Intel $22Bench 36%, 20,872 samples | 103x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 66x |
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples | 58x |
GPU | |
---|---|
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples | 145x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 54x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 45x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $309 |