Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-DG3+  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '19 at 03:40
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 68.8
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 122
52% 85.2 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 197
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1216 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.7.4
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.48% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 33.9
0% 21.7 fps
MRender 30.4
Gravity 25
Splatting 34.3
25% 29.9 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 8.48%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 500GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 5.8 6.5 6 5.5 5.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 75.5
Write 10.8
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 5.6
20% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 3.8
757% 4.67 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 41%
Virtual Disk 891GB
39GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 7.7 6.7 7.4 7.6 7.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.5% Poor
Read 75.8
Write 12.8
Mixed 17.8
SusWrite 7.4
21% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 5.5
840% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.5% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.7
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-DG3+ Builds (Compare 547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback