Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	9.73% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4560-$31 70,054 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 94.6 1-Core 101 2-Core 210 78% 135 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 239 37% 266 Pts	64-Core 299 18% 299 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740 30,433 User benchmarks, average bench 7% MSI(1462 8A9E) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.44 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	8.92% Terrible	Lighting 10.4 Reflection 9.69 Parallax 11.1 8% 10.4 fps	MRender 13.2 Gravity 9.97 Splatting 12.6 10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.92% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 80GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	9.73% Terrible	Read 23.9 Write 71.1 Mixed 34 10% 43 MB/s	4K Read 3.76 4K Write 11.6 4K Mixed 1.95 14% 5.76 MB/s	DQ Read 2.7 DQ Write 11.5 DQ Mixed 3.09 4% 5.78 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.73% Great: 23%
Virtual Disk 891GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 341GB free Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.6% Very poor	Read 27.3 Write 17.5 Mixed 18.8 16% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 7.93 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 6.09 1,022% 4.94 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2400 C15 Series 1x4GB 167 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	43% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 12.3 42% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 10.3 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 58.2 69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 25,824 samples	36x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	36x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	34x

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $389