Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory18.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120817
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 07 '19 at 22:24
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$95
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 91
2-Core 181
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 359
48% 359 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
Sapphire(174B 6000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1001.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.16% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 1.85
Parallax 1.62
1% 1.61 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.74
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.16%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 223 133 166 118 107 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.6% Below average
Read 186
Write 218
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 151
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 26.1
4K Mixed 8
27% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 144
121% 174 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 92%
GREYHOUNDMUSIC 2TB
96GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 82 85 85 83 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.9% Below average
Read 40.8
Write 54
Mixed 49.8
SusWrite 83.6
42% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.2
212% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 36%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
1TB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 19 19 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 32
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 19.7
38% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 73%
WD Elements 25A3 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 20 19 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 38
Mixed 32
SusWrite 19.5
42% 32 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.2% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,690 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback